Showing posts with label labor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label labor. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Go Take a Flying Great Leap Forward!

 


When the bureaucrats are manning the assembly lines, we will enter a time of prosperity in the reorganization. Next on the list, the decadent professors will be removed from their ivory towers and returned to the soil.

Farming?

If they are lucky!

I'm trying to be appropriately glib--I truly don't think we're listening to rational people in this administration. They see things are coming apart and have reached for a tube of strong glue. They then proceed to sniff it.

These are the same folks who will tell you that they foresee the factory pound-y-screw-y types of jobs will be done by robots, and the think-y-talk-y jobs will be done by AI. After all, you could solve most of your labor problems if you just didn't have people doing the labor, which is similar to the problems of voting. 

I'm still wondering about the sort of Field of Dreams approach to reindustrialization. If you build an empty space for the factories, will they come?

It has been a long, stupid day. I am very certain these people don't have a good handle on history.

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Oh, They'll Get in Line

 


I can recall finally understanding what "elitism" meant to anti-intellectual MAGAs, and basically, it was them being told they were wrong or cruel and being made to feel bad by...anybody. It wasn't about class or education status--it was the idea that someone out there was gonna tell you you wasn't exactly as good as them. So there! 

So, in the H-1B visa debate that is roiling TrumpWorld, Vivek Ramaswamy seems to have been part of the mild fracas happening on X by letting US (White) Americans know they culturally weren't producing well qualified tech job applicants because they didn't rise and grind the way Asian kids do. Too many jocks and prom queens and peaking in high school. MAGA was fine with "pull your pants up and take care of your kids" lectures directed at Black Americans, but if you tell them that their four touchdowns in a single game for Polk High School doesn't qualify them for more than selling shoes, they are going to get Big Mad. 

And we already know where white supremacist Laura Loomer was on this one:


Monday, October 21, 2024

TWGB: I Deserve a Break Today

 

Have you ever disassociated so hard you imagined that your parasocial enemy was suddenly some fat senior citizen cosplaying a service job because he wanted desperately to snow people into thinking he wasn't an elitist silver-spoon buttercup but could totally ball behind the french fry thing at a fast food restaurant because he had poor people job FOMO? and ...

What the whole entire fuck? 

Tuesday, September 3, 2024

Where Were Your Candidates on Labor Day?

 

Mine was working. 

I don't know where Trump was, but wherever JD Vance was, he was Tweeting unadvisedly


This man may have worked a service position once according to his book (and probably does not have it still on his resume), but he has demonstrated no feeling for working people. He's used to no-show jobs. Just like he doesn't show up to vote for working people. 

Monday, August 19, 2024

The Harris Plan--Supporting Our Values

 


What if the way to support families and the middle class was to put our money where our values are and invest in the changes we want to see to make life better for the average American? 

It's a loaded question, and I get why some folks would be mad--supporting new families and encouraging homeownership are fine things for people who want to talk about financial security for households to reference, but actually doing something about it? Isn't that the business of other people to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps about? 

Look, I used to do a feature on this blog about our "Know Your Class War" and just like "Climate Sunday", it fell by the wayside because we have a first-world economy with disastrous outcomes in terms of health, happiness, and upward mobility in general. Democrats have, through measures like Social Security, Medicare, the ACA, and others--actually tried to do something about this. Republicans usually dub these measures "Communism".  (See Reagan and Medicare.)

Wednesday, September 20, 2023

Can't Anybody Here Play This Game?

 

(A post also to be known as "Republicans in Disarray.) 

I don't know why I'm leading with the story that a resolution from Matt Gaetz drafted September 15th was found under a baby changing table in the restroom underneath the House floor.  I guess it's because of my astonishment that we didn't hear about such a resolution like, Friday. And who left it behind? Maybe Gaetz himself, setting up the changing table with a couple parallel o' grams of Bolivian Borax to chase away the Floridian palmetto bugs in his high-rise skull? I know Gaetz was opposed to McCarthy even being Speaker like he was a new stepdad threatening to be the boss of him. 

And of such drama is the current House GOP currently made. They can't pass a resolution on Pentagon spending. None of them know what they want. They want to cut the spending. They want to fund border defense. They want to strengthen the defense but maybe not fund aid to Ukraine (the Moscow Marge Caucus, I guess you'd call it). Kevin McCarthy can't count votes and he doesn't count in uniting his troops. And I seriously don't know who is supposed to be Speaker for the GOP if McCarthy isn't. Scalise? Maybe they don't want nobody to be the Boss of Them. 

They just want to shut down the government for no good reason and impeach the Democratic president for no good reason the year before the presidential election? Is that so wrong?

(YES?)

What it means is they can't govern. But take heart!

Um, Trump is the leader of their party and a hapless fuckwit, also, too. It seems like, while in my heart of hearts I wanted Trump's document investigation to reveal selling secrets or something very dire, the bare reality is Trump just apparently took boxes of paper to save trees, because clearly, there were clean bits you could still use. All of this lovely notepaper for grocery lists and whatnot--says a Mar-a-Lago employee. 

And the material is back in the hands of the government to review with his peculiar Sharpie handed seismic handwriting and all. He also obstructed justice by telling his secretary she didn't know anything about the boxes she saw, just like nobody was supposed to know about all the boxes. Of all the stupid, stupid things. 

Saturday, September 16, 2023

TWGB: The Watchdog Failure

 


This is how the latest iteration of Meet the Press is going to play out? One former WHPC sitting down with a man who has 91 charges and four indictments and listen to him babble about labor, a thing he has no idea about because his working life has been about stiffing contractors and hiring the undocumented?  Trump knows how to cheat on his wives, his taxes, cheat his workers out of pay, but he does not and will not learn shit about the auto industry or the union people making it go. 

Autoworkers would have jobs if their company management would roll with the times. There's a failure of vision when business leaders decide money over everything: and what could be reasonably profitable businesses are looking at short-term profitability or face liquidation because quick cash yo!

I've never been persuaded that businessman Trump even understands business, and not just because he bankrupted casinos playing with house money--like buying properties practically next to each other and keeping them kind of low-rent and all. I can sympathize with people who think the casino times was just him playing with a version of money laundering--why not? Things like Trump insisting on the US having the highest CBT rate when we don't, or pretending the foreign countries pay the tariffs in his entirely not a free-market scheme kind of make me wonder just what Trump got for his Daddy-purchased business degree. 

The man's fucking dim and has been for years. His lightbulb has been blown but he insists he's lighting up the world. So why are Megyn Kelly and Kristin Welker giving his adjudicated rapist ass and four-time indicted self such a platform? 

Monday, August 14, 2023

Texas Isn't Here for the Children

 


So, I feel like I just posted about how Texas isn't really pro-life, just pro-punishing female-bodied people. It feels like I just talked about how Governor Abbott turned the Rio Grande into a death moat--which had already taken life. And here we are, talking about how a pregnant person working for the state was told she doesn't have any rights as a worker as to the safety of her pregnancy and her fetus (a wanted child) didn't have any rights, when rights of the fetus was the exact reason why a healthy woman had to carry death in her womb--a fetus that would never be viable. Here we are, talking about a dead baby on a migrant bus on the way from Texas to Chicago, driven like a longhorn from ranch to packing lot. 

I'm not here to say Ms. Issa's fetus had rights--I'm going to say she had rights as a human being who had a wanted pregnancy and whose life could have been in the balance over a problematic delivery.  I'm not here to say Greg Abbott personally caused the death of the migrant baby that he sent on that final leg of their mortal journey--I'm saying he's oblivious to the value of that child, alive, and the value of that child's parents as workers, and migrants as being not a problem, but a community of souls. 

I'm saying that a person who dreams of saw blades or razor wire greeting people who mostly walked over a thousand miles to find safety is a sadist of the worst kind--the kind with the power to practice his sadism on especially vulnerable people. 

I don't know what it takes to get people like him out of office--the people had a more caring human being in his opponent in the last election. But if Democrats cannot demonstrate the examples of El Paso, Uvalde, the death moat, the migrant buses, and all the ways Texas GOP make the state more terrible and less secure for humans to have bodies in--what hope for humanity is there? Not that Texas would listen to me. But from where I am, what a government! When does it change!

Monday, July 17, 2023

And the Trees Didn't Even Do Anything Wrong (UPDATED)

 

So here's an image that got me hotter than July sun on blacktop: these studio sonsofbitches pruned the trees. Were they even their trees to prune? (Maybe not, it looks like they might have been the city's trees.) And is this even the time of year you would normally do that? (Yeah, I dunno about that, you guys.) 

Now, leave out the whole level of mental motherfuckery you would need to possess to even decide "I know what, let's just take a little bit of natural coolness away from the picketers as if that's going to make them not want to resolve this strike in a way that lets them afford to live in the town they work" or anywhere else and shit like that, but also says "and if the trees die, they die." 

Now I'm not arborist, I'm not, I know it. I had fig trees, and they weren't meant for my area of the northeast. They got wrapped but still didn't survive a deep freeze. My grape vines do alright I guess. But that there looks like deliberate and unseasonable butchery for dramatic effect.

They should leave drama to the artists and then pay them for it. And if they screwed with the city's trees trying to strike break, they ought to pay for that, too. That image of those trees is just stark stupid miser shit. 

UPDATES: Why looky here! Apparently, the city had nothing to do with the pruning mess, and that's an unfair practices violation in addition to the city investigation.  Looks like some FA is going to be followed with FO.

Good. 

UPDATE: They got fined all of $250 by the city?

Tuesday, May 16, 2023

TWGB: The Quality of Mercy is Priced at $2 Million

 

So, lawsuit against Giuliani just got really graphic, and if you want to read the whole thing, I recommend having a sick bag or bucket handy because the parts where he emotionally and physically abuses a female employee is nasty and I wish my read on him didn't feel validated. She says she has texts and emails and even recordings of his abusiveness and more.

But the part I notice is the claim that she can validate that Giuliani was asking $2 million for pardons, because this wasn't new. It's just amazing we have validation now. Also, it appears that as early as 2019, Trump was scared enough of Dark Brandon that he was going to have a plan for losing, but claiming the election was stolen anyway. 

And if that doesn't remind me of anything?   

Yeah. We knew. It was always about fuckery. Undermining democracy. Damaging what makes our democracy effective and unique. 

Sunday, September 18, 2022

Know Your Class War: Immigration and The People Problem

 


I made what I thought was a kind of anodyne comment on Twitter about how immigrants were demonized for stealing jobs when that wasn't what they did at all: if they were hired for a job, showed up and did the job and got paid for it, they weren't stealing a job, they were working a job. To me, this was just sense. I've said it before right here. Anyway, however I said it, it was assumed I did not know that employers intentionally employed undocumented workers because they lived in fear of being deported and therefore were exploited and damn, I know.   It's hard not to be aware of it

The point I was trying to make is, the immigrants aren't bodying people out of kitchens and off assembly-lines and taking over retail warehouses and starting to collect paychecks by doing nothing at all. They aren't stealing jobs--employers are giving them jobs. Are they legally doing so? Yeah, if they are not checking if they have a right to work, that's illegal. If they are paying them under the table, they know that's wrong. So why are we going to get spun up over undocumented workers trying to feed, clothe, and house themselves over whether employers are complying with the law? 

Immigrants aren't stealing jobs. They might have an impact on local wages and employer choices, but that isn't on them. They are taking available jobs because they have to eat.  And if you wanted better local wages and better watchdogs over labor issues--you could most certainly vote for pro-labor political candidates and push for labor issues wherever and whenever you could. You should support living wage laws and support strengthening regulatory leverage over abusive employers. Immigrants are just trying to live. 

The second thing I want to address isn't the "stealing people's jobs" thing, but the dehumanizing thing. I might not be a labor expert any more than I am a lawyer or a historian, but when people start talking about other people as a "problem" or as a "question" and start talking about transporting them to tent cities, or camps, or ghettos, or reservations, or just thinking "relocating" is the answer to how to ever deal with people--you aren't thinking about people as people, but as some kind of unwanted furniture. That shit is fascism. 

I get that people feel entitled to their resentment over the idea that marginalized people occasionally appear to make out from certain insufficiencies in our capitalist moral landscape. But I am fucking harrowed by the penalties human beings face for trying to come here and build a better world for themselves by trusting monsters. How desperate does one have to be to be positioned to sit and be fried alive? 

People are not the problem. Our willingness to not see people as people, but as units of labor are. Or as political pawns and props, or as useful targets of resentment-fueled propaganda. Immigration, like resolving the homeless crisis or any other thing where people are deprived of resources, can be an unlocked asset by a wealthy country figuring out where the resources are. We are mean and we suck as people because we don't focus on doing stuff like that. We don't see people as people and useful in their own right and would throw them away rather than invest in their having the lives they should that let them maximize the good they can give in return. 

Anyway, that's my $.02. 
 

Monday, September 5, 2022

The History of Labor Day


Greeting fellow workers! Hope you treated yourself and considered your value today!

UPDATE: Did you know approval and appreciation of unions is on an upswing? My personal guess is it has a lot to do with COVID-19 when we collectively experienced crises related to the fragility of our employment status, the need for health benefits and paid leave, and absolutely treacherous workplace safety. Work is political. People work to earn a living, but work is not one's whole life. Supporting your fellow workers to make workplaces better improves productivity and helps the business thrive by decreasing turnover, burnout, and improving employee service. It's a good thing!

UPDATE: We often talk about how the labor movement put an end to child labor (conditionally) but the labor movement also protects aging workers by making retirement more comfortably possible

Note--an important part of the end of child labor is free, compulsory education. A free and fair society means that our children have the means to grow up and fend for themselves because they have the knowledge to do so. A free and fair society means we don't write off people because they are no longer productive workers. 


Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Labor Day: Is It A Crime?

 

We talk sometimes about "working for a living", so I just want to interject that working doesn't always provide a living. It provides the barebones of existing, maybe feeding oneself and ones' kids, inadequately, going into soul-disrupting debt at times, relying on various kinds of assistance at others.

Friday, March 5, 2021

Uncool

This woman is out of her damn mind if she thinks this is how you bring your unserious ass to the US Senate and pretend you scored points making not one thing better for anyone. I guessed that she was disingenuous in her response regarding the filibuster, but now I flat-out think she's a fake. It wouldn't cost her damn thing politically to do what's right. She isn't keeping her liberal support stunting like this for what? Five confused McCain Republicans? And even if this thing was a hard decision, she could have done the world a favor and acted like it instead of coming out like an overgrown high school child. 

She can just decide not to run again and spare someone the expense of primarying her if this is how little she thinks about doing it right, because that was disappointing.

UPDATE:  Criticizing her about this is apparently supposed to be sexist


Sinema’s office responded to a question about the gesture by making the absurd claim that the inquiry is sexist. “Commentary about a female senator’s body language, clothing, or physical demeanor does not belong in a serious media outlet,” Hannah Hurley, a spokesperson for Sinema, told HuffPost.
No. It would be sexist to have two different standards, and I honestly think pulling out sexism on this particular gesture is a shame and a distraction from what makes it bad. It's bad because it looked like she was happy to vote against a pay raise that would lift millions of people, many of them women and working families, out of poverty. I support women, but I don't support foolishness from women because I don't support foolishness from anyone, and especially not regarding things that matter. 

Raising the minimum wage--now that would support women, because they would be better able to support themselves with the money they make. That's good old fashioned "feminism goals", not this "breaking the internet" and "yas queen"-ing people for their style over their substance.

UPDATE: Just to add, she's one of eight Democrats who voted against increasing the minimum wage, and of course, it could be part of a separate bill, but like, why? It's overdue to be increased, it would significantly improve the finances of people working right now, it gets money circulating, and it actually cuts government spending in some respects because people need less aid, because they get money from work. Maybe tying it to COVID relief is problematic, but income inequality is responsible for the impact COVID-19 has had and this remediates that.  I don't see why this one has to be hard.

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

Memorializing "Virtual Nobodies"

We have now passed a terrible milestone in the US: the official count of 200,000 COVID-19 deaths, which I think can not be memorialized properly without also acknowledging that COVID-19 deaths are preventable. We have the information, and have had the information for some time, that the virus is airborne, which strongly indicates that people should wear masks and socially distance. The current president of the US maintains that everyone knew in February, when he was taped by Bob Woodward warning that the virus was airborne, that this was the case.

Even now, we're only quibbling about how far apart people should be to avoid the spread.

Trump admitted on tape in March that he was purposefully playing down news of the virus, and that he was aware that even children could be susceptible. White House spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany, perhaps unaware that everyone knows she's lying, and that anyway, she's supposed to be working for the White House, not the Trump campaign, says he never plays the virus down and even goes so far as to say he tells the truth. She uses a maximal hypothetical number of 2 million people*, an absurd figure that no one would have predicted for the US by September 2020, as being the number our current death toll should be compared to, instead of the actual death toll of other nations happening right now in the real, not hypothetical world in which we happen to live.

And why does she lie so outstandingly? Because she is hewing to Trump's own "moving goalposts" method of escaping blame. And she's trying to cover for the heinousness of something Trump said recently, like a teen store manager trying to pave over a corporate screw-up:

Monday, September 7, 2020

Labor Day, Essentially



So, as a person who was determined to be essential back in March and worked with only three unpaid days off in more or less same as normal straits and the spouse of a person who was also made essential as a grocery worker who worked for a short while far more than his usual allotment, and the relative of someone who as a nurse contracted COVID on the job and thankfully, all were young and healthy! Let's just say this Labor Day, my thoughts are with all workers who had to keep up with the COVID times, whether you got shafted entirely, had your hours reduced, or found yourself working in dangerous conditions and had to function above and beyond.

There's a kind of bias to the idea of "essential worker"--someone's paying us for our labor, so it must be worth something, whatever it is. And we are worth more than what we do for a living, even if we need work to keep our very lives together, because our jobs constitute something less than the entirety of what we are capable of.  And for those who lost jobs due to the public situation of COVID-19 spread--whose industries were harmed because of the necessary public-facing nature of those industries, nothing about the value of the work you do has changed, only the demand.

Things economically have gone awry in the US in part because of a failure to appreciate that the citizen worker is both the source and consumer of value. I'm not saying I know exactly what to do about that, but I resent when elected leaders talk about jobs in glee about gaining back half of what was precipitously lost in a short while over bad public management of a pandemic there should have been planning for, and with no acknowledgement of the lives that have been lost due to poor planning and privileging the economy over those lives.

They also need to be judged based on the products of their labors. Some may need to be made redundant.

Saturday, May 2, 2020

Mayday, Mayday

The photo on the left was an example of Nazi irony: the Nazis expected work without freedom, unless you consider death a kind of freedom. The photo on the right (from a protest against state COVID-19 restrictions in Illinois) seems to be intended, in one light, in a non-ironic way: Having the choice to work (to open businesses) is freedom. But there is also an ironic way of looking at it: other people's labor make the protester free. An open hair salon means someone else works on a person's hair, a restaurant means someone else prepares a meal and deals with the dirty dishes.

These protests are about other people's labor, and other people's exposure to a disease that can be deadly. Being International Workers' Day, it's a good time to point out that loosening restrictions doesn't make many workers free: it gives them the choice of working and being exposed to a disease that can kill, or not working and being unable to collect any kind of benefits--giving them the likelihood of sickness on one end, food insecurity and the threat of homelessness on the other. "Opening the state" sounds like freedom, but it means businesses are forced to open, make arrangements for social distancing at their place of business (which might mean costly alterations) and trying to smartly schedule staffing--and may still not translate into adequate custom to justify the overhead--because most people are still scared to do commerce as usual (and rightly so!).

The paradigm is one in which retail service workers or public transit workers can become ill because of other people's personal decisions. These people are just trying to put food on the table and live their lives, and the freedom to serve other people so that they can pay their bills shouldn't equal death for them.

Sunday, March 29, 2020

The Post-Pandemic

As is sometimes the case, regular commenter Formerly Amherst got me to thinking a bit on a different tangent. I don't like the idea of prognostication where serious events are concerned all that much, for the most part, because I think people have a tendency to ascribe their own meanings and desires on things. Where the coronavirus is concerned, I've already noticed with distaste that some people are viewing it in "cleansing" terms--always a bad sign. I don't think much of people who imagine that a random RNA replicant was sent by some fate to rid the planet of, well, you name it. Old folk. The sick. The poor. The Blue State liberal menace. The Red State conservative menace. The people of XYZ religion. The lousy secularists. To give us something greater than war to worry about. To wipe out the lesser virus, humans, who have been mucking the planet up. Etc. It's a very ugly game some people play--and the only way to win at being human is not to play.

I also don't like the habit of thinking that a sufficiently tragic episode of history will necessarily be didactic. The idea that "Now people will--(do the thing I've always really hoped they would)" is natural, but people often do carry multiple, mixed, and even muddled messages away from events. There is a logic to assuming that people will, after a massive worldwide healthcare crisis, come away with dramatically different opinions about how health care is managed, such as incurring an interest in truly universal "free" (as in "provided as a fully-funded right of all planetary citizens") healthcare--but logical assumptions seem to have little to do with actual human behavior. The human mind has a weird trick of using current events to reinforce one's own priors, even when counter-intuitive.

We're talking monkeys. If that sounds like I'm shrugging at the business of guessing what folks will do--bingo. Look at the differing responses people are having right now to the potential for disaster staring them in the face. The aftermath won't look much different. Fingers of blame will be pointed, but it will be spread around enough to be thinned out. Some people will look back, after a plausible or even implausible interval, to say "Things weren't even all that bad."

Monday, September 2, 2019

Happy Labor Day, Fellow Workers!

Hello, fellow workers, once and future workers, office workers and outdoor workers, and manufacturing floor workers, field hands and dab hands, sex workers and home carers, cubicle rats and wage slaves, documented workers and undocumented workers, professionals and paid amateurs, unpaid interns and well-paid union folks, grindstone go-getting candleburners of every conceivable shift--your value doesn't lie in what you do alone, but you give value to the world in what you do and have done, and respect must be paid. Also fair remuneration and at least earned time off plus federal holidays, if you asked me. But barring that, a tip of my figurative hat and continued support for workers' rights.


Thursday, December 6, 2018

In the Long Run, We'll All Be Dead





There are a couple of instances in which the "we'll all be dead" paradigm makes its way into history. I guess for people who do economics, Keynes is the obvious one: In the long run we are all dead. Which is, on the face of it, absolutely true. To quote my father's favorite musical philosopher: "No one here gets out alive".   But just talking about myself, honestly, as a person past the age of 40 who might shuffle on another fifty years, what the actual fuck? Because I have come to grips the way a fragile mortal can having had near misses with blood alcohol flirtations and closed fist frustrations, and who can comfortably assert that my childlessness will proceed apace until my eventual oxygen permit revocation, that if and when I die, I'd like not to have fucked the entire earth up too much for the progeny of others. And I feel that way about the budget, also. We owe more to future generations than a government unfit to do more than bomb other countries and service its debt.

I see a really strong link between Trump's budget nihilism and his climate change nihilism. And for the record, I think this isn't any different from any other dues-paying practicing Republican, either.

I know George W. Bush understood his place in history might not even matter eventually, because he'd be dead when his legacy was eventually sorted out.  It could seem self-effacing that way, but in a more immediate way, it seems a bit like throwing off responsibility for the history one helped create. As if history would never affirmatively ascribe any blame, or convince one to take in the degree to which one was a person with agency to stop any harm, or constructively benefit lives.

And ever so many followed in this wake--they maintain they know climate change is happening, but can't be arsed to care. Or they deny it utterly, because they are Jim Inhofe or similar. Because the outcomes are not their problem, but service to their donors possibly is?  They realize that the debt crisis that looms is a real thing, but want to believe that slippery ideas about how much the economy can grow if people weren't taxed so much does more for us than the very simple idea that government should raise revenues from taxation to pay for the necessities of its ongoing missions.

We need pragmatists in government, and people who not only understand history, but will fight to improve upon it, regardless of the earth that will lay over their remains some day.

Trump thinks a debt crisis will not matter to himself when he is out or office or dead-- the same Donald Trump who records every knock or slight against himself, and rages against it on Twitter.

Dead or alive, we can blame such things as the trade war already hurting people in rural areas, leading people to sell their farms, or the trade war shutting car factories, as mistakes that, regardless of Trump's mortality, can be laid at Trump's feet from a policy stance.

He can leave office or die, in the long run, or even a short, angry, sedentary fat man's run, but he would still be responsible for his policies, his appointments, and the choices he made.

And fucking up the future for American business, farming, manufacturing, is not making America Great Again, ever.

TWGB: It's Raining Shoes!

  It certainly has been a minute, hasn't it? So, what brings me out of self-imposed blogging exile, if not something very relevant to my...