Newsmax host suggests vaccines are “against nature,” and some diseases are “supposed to wipe out a certain amount of people”https://t.co/g1sIdQ949b pic.twitter.com/TgQNFLKAav
— Jason Campbell (@JasonSCampbell) July 12, 2021
I don't know this for a fact, but deep down I know that when someone says something like a disease or other natural disaster is supposed to wipe out a certain amount of people, they've got a list in mind of who has to go. Also, when I hear "against nature", I tend to think it's supposed to be understood as "against God".
Some people aren't happy unless others are getting "smited".
3 comments:
It's just odd that the "list" of people being killed by the virus are their own viewers and ideological brothers and sisters.
Anti-vaxxers being killed by the virus they refuse to be vaccinated against? Darwinism at its finest. Most effective way to smarten up the gene pool.
As with the anti-vax turn in Tennessee and elsewhere, I think the generalizations that people have been making about who fares worst from covid19 (minorities, old people, the disabled) are still prevalent in the grim calculation: it's a kind of "act of nature" eugenics. They are making a bet on people's lives. It's also a kind of white (and probably Christian) privilege way of thinking (We are select, so we will be saved.)
They've believed since early months (wrongly, and much more wrongly since Delta variant) that it doesn't harm white people.
Post a Comment