And I won't even speculate about where that person is coming from. It is possible that these statements or narratives are just the personal way that Brazile views the election, and if she aired these views and some of the facts about her perspective happen to be wholly wrong, then it should be on her to set the record straight. But that she has aired these views apparently without vetting the fact-claims first, and without respects to how they would be received in an atmosphere already tainted with tons of misinformation and disinformation, makes me shake my head.
It's just feckless. It give ammunition to rumor-mongers and doesn't shed a new light on anything at all.
I'm disappointed. At this point, it really doesn't even matter to me what her intent was. She is not new to politics. But she seems to be a little new, right now.
2 comments:
Someone else I read commented a few days ago that she's probably getting ready to cash in and sign up to play a "Feckless Liberal" commentator for Fox News.
The longer this goes on and the more odd she gets, the more I think that this predictions is correct.
Meh.
Seriously, why are so many liberals even giving this long-time hanger-on a platform.
She's never been elected. Never even stood for election.
She's a 'strategist', a 'campaign adviser'.
Fer crissakes, she's Papadapoulis with a longer track record.
She. Does. Not. Matter.
Primaries do not matter. They are not constitutionally mandated, a political party is a private advocacy organization that can choose its nominee however it pleases. And it SHOULD make every effort to nominate the candidate it believes has the best chance of winning.
Otherwise you get Boaty McBoatface.
This really isn't difficult...
Post a Comment