Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Microaggressions, Colorblindness and Trying Harder

I decided not to post anything on Monday, not necessarily to honor anybody, but just because I wasn't up to figuring out how to best address Sarah Palin's race card in the hole, or the pile-on of a black athlete who made the PR mistake of enthusiastically addressing his skills in an interview, like that never happens, with respects to a day honoring Dr. King. That was my silence. I don't like it. I wish I always knew what to say.

Sometimes the silence of allies is to make room for other people to speak. Sometimes I know I don't have the right understanding or experiences to address something, and so help me, I hold back for fear of doing it wrong. Maybe I shouldn't. Maybe I need to be more prepared to stand corrected so long as I'm speaking out. I'm still working on that. And also, this post could have a fuck of a lot less to do with my process than what is wrong the world today--and don't tell me there isn't something, still

So I think I will take on what Palin said--and does anyone think she doesn't have a bead by now on how what she said would be judged when responses to her "blood libel" comments or "debt is slavery" comment went totally batshit in social media coverage? Does one snarkily suggest that the president is somehow throwing down the "race card" without any idea how wrong it would be, even now, if the first black president never addressed race at all when real discrimination was still a quantifiable thing in terms of arrests, sentencing, employment, opportunity, treatment by law enforcement and so on? Trying to create the conditions where all citizens get equal treatment under the law is kind of this Constitutional thing he and Eric Holder have been working on. It is a real tragedy that Sarah Palin does not get that. I blame the schools she went to and her environment, though.



There is a screwed-up idea of what justice could be called "color-blindness" that I guess I understand but I think I don't find useful. When someone like Palin posts the idea that:

“‘I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.’ – Martin Luther King, Jr.
I think she gets it wrong in thinking that King was envisioning a world that did not see color.  He is imagining a world were it is seen but does not matter in term of judging people, like his own children. She is saying that Obama says things like "Trayvon Martin would look like my son" or whatever, based on race. He isn't saying see Trayvon Martin's race. He's saying "see his humanity first".  See what he could achieve. See the lost potential. Whether talking about convicted pot smokers or disenfranchised African-Amercans, we have a system that is not colorblind in practice. When we talk about a lot of things, the numbers aren't reflecting a colorblind result. So race has to be discussed, even still. The results of race bias is real. Yes, a white person is foolish for not still knowing that. 

And also, I don't even see why the Sherman thing is thing. I thought athletes trash-talked all the time. 
Also, Richard Sherman is actually kind of the ideal athelete narrative of someone who thrives because of their committment to excellence, and then gives back because he just is that kind of person.  Maybe he has a right to be proud.  And that answers for itself on the field and in his personal life all the time.

3 comments:

Fe Adamsonn said...

"In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends." Exactly! I agree with this relating to real friends.

Milspouse

Anonymous said...

Super-rich, world-famous, idolized celebrities always hand me a laugh with their laments. With celebrity football players, once you get past the violence, the egotism, and the narcissism, what's left?

You know, my caped crusader friend, one of the things that the left misunderstands about the bulk of conservatives is that we are rarely prejudiced.

I think the confusion (beyond political gamesmanship) comes because conservatives want to treat minorities equally, but we do not assign them a special victim status. As a consequence, I think the left mistakes a basic, even-handed evaluation for a diminishment.

Oddly enough, a large number of tea party members were 1960s activists. You can feel some of the old 60s fervor in a new and more mature perception.

Actually, minorities are fine with us, they just don't enjoy a victims' aristocracy.

--Formerly Amherst

Vixen Strangely said...

To the extent that I even speak for "The Left" (I just about speak for me) I'm not sure about any of that. My post right here is for the most part about reactions that don't seem fair to me, as a privileged white lady--not even necessarily in the context of whether the reaction is coming from conservatives.

Now, Sarah Palin, I guess, just strikes me as a special case. Her political axes always seem to need public sharpening. The tone she regularly hits ("pals around with terrorists"?)with respects to Obama leans towards un-American and race-consciousness, as if she whispering, "not one of us". Or shouting the same with a US flag on one shoulder and a Confederate flag over the other. Is it on purpose?

I do not know what is in her heart.

The furore over Sherman's trash-talking seems to have been a question of honor over the perception of bad sportmanship he had from a colleague. The reaction to him mostly centered around calling him a thug, with variants on other lesser primates and the ever popular n-bomb burning up Twitter. Like people were waiting awhile to drop some n-bombs and whoa! Along came this guy. It just seemed a weirdly disproportionate and racialized response from so many corners--I do not know the political backgrounds of all of them. I'll chalk that up to "a lot of people have some nerves calling out someone else for manners".

You know, I wasn't around for a lot of the civil rights struggle, so I mostly just talk about where "The Left" seems be concentrating our efforts today--I really don't think we're about preferential treatment to remedy the past victimization, but trying to work out ways our system still does create inequities. I refer to preventing barriers from being put in place to access to voting, housing, and hiring, not any kind of quota. I don't see where this "victim's aristocracy" is in any danger of occuring. (Although if there's some sense that we have POC's in the current administration who are there for reasons other than merit, I can only roll my eyes. )

Nancy Mace is not Okay

  This picture is a screencap from Rep. Mace's own Twitter-feed (I'm still not calling it "X") and this is s few days in t...