I can't say I envy his position, though, because as I commented on one of Bette Noir's posts at Rumproast:
Straddling the “yay, made budget happen” boat and the “no, spending bad” ship is trying to be in two boats going in opposite directions.I don't know that everyone who saw this pivot understood at once how untenable it is to be on both sides of this particular issue--especially if you happen to actually be Paul Ryan, although David Kurtz at TPM put it simply: Laughingstock Alert. Also at issue is whether it is good for the House GOP membership having this fight at the doorstep of the 2014 election. President Obama seems more inclined lately to use the bully pulpit--and I think an explanation of the perils of default might make this gesture on their part (a look-busy play from a do-little Congress) a real liability.
The sad thing is this quote:
“We as a caucus -- along with our Senate counterparts -- are going to meet and discuss what it is we’re going to want out of the debt limit,” Ryan said. “We don’t want nothing out of this debt limit. We’re going to decide what it is we’re going to accomplish out of this debt limit fight.”They don't know what they want--they will be doing it just because?
I might be misreading, but I think that politics has overridden policy to the point where the House GOP have lost what in the Bush 41 years was called "the vision thing". Guys like Paul Ryan should be displaying vision--but I'm afraid it kind of looks like the same old politics from here. And that sort of thing has been pretty dysfunctional so far.
No comments:
Post a Comment